Object-oriented Design (OOD) is a powerful pattern for building software that allows developers to create modular, reusable, and maintainable code and build complex and scalable systems. C++ is a popular programming language that supports object-oriented design principles, making it an ideal choice for developing large-scale applications. In this article, we will explore the key concepts of object-oriented design and how they can be applied in C++ to create robust and modular software solutions.
Understanding Object-Oriented Design
Object-oriented design revolves around the concept of objects, which encapsulate data and behavior into a single entity. It promotes modular development, code reusability, and easier maintenance. The three fundamental principles of object-oriented programming (OOP) are encapsulation, inheritance, and polymorphism.
Abstraction
Abstraction is a key principle in object-oriented design that focuses on creating simplified models of real-world entities. It allows developers to represent complex systems in a more manageable and understandable way. Abstraction involves hiding complex implementation details and exposing only the essential features of an object. It allows programmers to focus on the essential aspects of an object’s behavior while hiding unnecessary complexities.
In C++, abstraction can be achieved through classes and interfaces. A class defines the essential properties and behaviors of an object, while an interface defines a contract specifying a set of methods that a class implementing the interface must provide.
Modularity
Modularity emphasizes breaking down a system into smaller, self-contained modules. Modules should provide a high-level abstraction of a particular functionality. Each module should have a clear single responsibility and interact with other modules through well-defined interfaces. This abstraction allows other modules to use the functionality without worrying about the internal implementation details. This promotes code reusability, maintainability, and ease of testing.
Design Patterns
Design patterns are an essential part of object-oriented design in C++ (and in software engineering in general). They provide proven solutions to common software design problems. They serve as guidelines for structuring code and capturing best practices.
Some popular design patterns in C++ include the Factory, Observer, and Strategy patterns.
Design patterns can be used to address specific challenges and improve the overall quality of the software. They enhance maintainability and scalability of your code, leading to more efficient and robust software systems.
Classes and Objects in C++
In C++, classes serve as the blueprint for creating objects and are the building blocks of object-oriented design. To create a class, we define its properties (data members) and behaviors (member functions). We can then create objects (instances) of the class to work with the defined data and behaviors.
For example, consider a class called “Car” that represents a car object. It may have data members like “brand,” “model,” and “color,” and member functions like “start,” “accelerate,” and “brake.” By encapsulating data and methods within the Car class, we can create multiple Car objects, each with its own distinct set of properties and behaviors.
Composition
Composition is a way to create complex objects by combining simpler objects or components, rather than inheriting from a base or parent class. To put it simply, composition contains instances of other classes that implement the desired functionality. In C++, composition can be implemented by including objects of one class as data members within another class.
Object composition models a “has-a” relationship between two objects. A car Has-A(n) engine.
Composition is the most specialized form of aggregation and is often what most OO designers and programmers think of when they consider aggregation. Composition implies containment and is most often synonymous with a whole-part relationship – that is, the whole entity is composed of one or more parts. The whole contains the parts. The Has-A relationship applies to composition. The outer object, or whole, can be made up of parts. With composition, parts do not exist without the whole. Implementation is usually an embedded object – that is, a data member of the contained object type. On rare occasions, the outer object will contain a pointer or reference to the contained object type; however, when this occurs, the outer object will be responsible for the creation and destruction of the inner object. The contained object has no purpose without its outer layer. Likewise, the outer layer is not ideally complete without its inner, contained piece. [1]
For example, a class called “Engine” can be composed within the “Car” class, representing the car’s engine as a separate object. This allows the Car class to leverage the functionality of the Engine class while maintaining a modular and flexible design.
class Engine {
private:
std::string engineType;
public:
Engine(const std::string& engineType) : engineType(engineType) {}
void start() {
std::cout << "Engine started. Type: " << engineType << std::endl;
}
void stop() {
std::cout << "Engine stopped. Type: " << engineType << std::endl;
}
};
class Car {
private:
std::string make;
std::string model;
Engine engine;
public:
Car(const std::string& make, const std::string& model, const std::string& engineType)
: make(make), model(model), engine(engineType) {}
void start() {
std::cout << "Starting the car. Make: " << make << ", Model: " << model << std::endl;
engine.start();
}
void stop() {
std::cout << "Stopping the car. Make: " << make << ", Model: " << model << std::endl;
engine.stop();
}
};
int main() {
Car car("Ford", "Mustang", "V8");
car.start();
car.stop();
return 0;
}
Object Composition is useful in a C++ context because it allows us to create complex classes by combining simpler, more easily manageable parts. This reduces complexity and allows us to write code faster and with less errors because we can reuse code that has already been written, tested, and verified as working.
With composition, classes and objects are loosely coupled, meaning you can more easily switch these components without breaking the code. In contrast with Inheritance, which has the tightest form of coupling in object-oriented programming, changing a base class can cause unwanted side effects on its subclasses.
In general, if you can design a class using composition, you should design a class using composition. Classes designed using composition are straightforward, flexible, and robust.
Encapsulation
Encapsulation is the process of bundling data and associated operations within a class.
Encapsulation ensures that the internal implementation details are hidden and accessed only through well-defined interfaces.
C++ provides access specifiers (public, private, and protected) to control the visibility and accessibility of class members. Private members can only be accessed within the scope of the class, while public members can be accessed from outside the class. Protected members are accessible within the class and its derived classes.
The private members of a class are hidden from code outside of the class and access to them is provided through public member functions. This provides data abstraction and information hiding, preventing direct access to the internal implementation details. This data hiding mechanism enhances data security and allows for better code organization.
For example, we have a BankAccount class that demonstrates encapsulation:
class BankAccount {
private:
std::string accountNumber;
double balance;
public:
BankAccount(const std::string& accountNumber)
: accountNumber(accountNumber), balance(0.0) {}
void deposit(double amount) {
balance += amount;
std::cout << "Deposited $" << amount << " into account " << accountNumber << std::endl;
}
void withdraw(double amount) {
if (balance >= amount) {
balance -= amount;
std::cout << "Withdrawn $" << amount << " from account " << accountNumber << std::endl;
} else {
std::cout << "Insufficient balance in account " << accountNumber << std::endl;
}
}
double getBalance() const {
return balance;
}
};
int main() {
BankAccount account("123456789");
account.deposit(1000.0);
account.withdraw(500.0);
double balance = account.getBalance();
std::cout << "Current balance: $" << balance << std::endl;
return 0;
}
The BankAccount class has private member variables accountNumber and balance. These variables are encapsulated within the class, meaning they are hidden from external access.
The class provides public methods to interact with the encapsulated data. The deposit method allows depositing money into the account, the withdraw method allows withdrawing money from the account (if the balance is sufficient), and the getBalance method allows retrieving the current balance.
The private member variables are accessed and modified only through these public methods. This ensures that the internal state of the BankAccount object remains consistent and controlled.
In the main function, we create an instance of the BankAccount class, passing the account number as a parameter. We then use the public methods (deposit, withdraw, and getBalance) to interact with the BankAccount object.
This demonstrates encapsulation by hiding the internal details (account number and balance) of the BankAccount class and providing controlled access through the public methods. External code cannot directly access or modify the private variables, ensuring data integrity and encapsulation.
Inheritance
Inheritance enables the creation of new classes (derived classes) based on existing classes (base classes). The derived classes inherit the properties and behaviors of the base class, allowing for code reuse and specialization. In C++, inheritance is implemented using the “class derived_class : access_specifier base_class” syntax. Inheritance hierarchies can be organized into multiple levels, forming a tree-like structure.
Inheritance promotes code reuse and supports the “is-a” relationship between classes. For example, a class “SportsCar” can inherit from the “Car” class, inheriting its properties and behaviors while adding additional features specific to sports cars.
class Car {
protected:
std::string make;
std::string model;
public:
Car(const std::string& make, const std::string& model)
: make(make), model(model) {}
void start() {
std::cout << "Starting the car. Make: " << make << ", Model: " << model << std::endl;
}
void stop() {
std::cout << "Stopping the car. Make: " << make << ", Model: " << model << std::endl;
}
};
class SportsCar : public Car {
private:
int topSpeed;
public:
SportsCar(const std::string& make, const std::string& model, int topSpeed)
: Car(make, model), topSpeed(topSpeed) {}
void displayInfo() {
std::cout << "Sports car information: Make: " << make << ", Model: " << model << ", Top Speed: " << topSpeed << " mph" << std::endl;
}
};
int main() {
SportsCar sportsCar("Ferrari", "812 GTS", 211);
sportsCar.displayInfo();
sportsCar.start();
sportsCar.stop();
return 0;
}
C++ supports single inheritance, multiple inheritance, and multilevel inheritance. In single inheritance, a class inherits properties and behaviors from a single base class. Multiple inheritance allows a class to inherit from multiple base classes. Multilevel inheritance involves creating a hierarchy of classes, where each derived class inherits from a base class.
Polymorphism
Polymorphism is often referred to as the third pillar of object-oriented programming, after encapsulation and inheritance. Polymorphism is a Greek word that means “many-shaped”.
Polymorphism allows objects of different classes to be treated as objects of a common base class. Base classes may define and implement virtual methods, and derived classes can override them, which means they provide their own definition and implementation. This enables a single interface to be used for multiple related classes, providing flexibility and extensibility in the code.
The type of Polymorphism can be distinguished by when the implementation is selected: statically (at compile time) or dynamically (at run time). This is known respectively as static dispatch and dynamic dispatch, and the corresponding forms of polymorphism are accordingly called static polymorphism and dynamic polymorphism.
Static polymorphism, also known as compile-time polymorphism, is implemented through mechanisms such as function overloading and templates in C++. It is resolved by the compiler at compile-time rather than at runtime. One of the key advantages of static polymorphism is its potential for faster execution. Here are a few reasons why static polymorphism can be faster:
-
No Dynamic Dispatch: Static polymorphism does not involve dynamic dispatch, where the appropriate function or method is determined at runtime based on the actual object type. In static polymorphism, the function to be called is resolved at compile-time based on the static type of the object or the argument types. This eliminates the overhead associated with runtime dispatch and reduces the number of indirections in the code.
-
Inlining: Static polymorphism enables the compiler to perform function inlining. When a function is called through static polymorphism, the compiler can replace the function call with the actual function code, eliminating the overhead of the function call itself. Inlining can lead to significant performance improvements as it reduces the function call overhead and enables better optimization opportunities.
-
Compile-Time Optimizations: Static polymorphism allows the compiler to perform various optimizations at compile-time. The compiler has complete knowledge of the types and operations involved, enabling it to apply specific optimizations like constant folding, loop unrolling, and common subexpression elimination. These optimizations can lead to more efficient code generation and improved performance.
-
Reduced Run-Time Overhead: Static polymorphism reduces the run-time overhead associated with dynamic dispatch mechanisms, such as virtual function tables. In dynamic polymorphism (runtime polymorphism), the runtime system needs to maintain and update virtual function tables to resolve function calls dynamically. This incurs additional memory and processing overhead. Static polymorphism avoids these runtime mechanisms, resulting in reduced overhead and potentially faster execution.
-
Early Error Detection: Static polymorphism allows the compiler to perform extensive type checking and error detection at compile-time. This enables catching potential errors, such as type mismatches, missing function definitions, or incorrect parameter types, during the compilation process. By detecting errors early, it reduces the chances of encountering runtime errors that may impact performance.
It’s important to note that the actual performance benefits of static polymorphism may vary depending on the specific code, compiler optimizations, and the nature of the problem being solved. In some cases, the difference in performance between static polymorphism and dynamic polymorphism may not be significant or may be influenced by other factors. Therefore, it’s essential to consider the design requirements, maintainability, and other trade-offs when choosing between static and dynamic polymorphism in a given scenario.
Compile time Polymorphism
Function overloading allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists to coexist in a class.
void print(int number) {
std::cout << "Printing an integer: " << number << std::endl;
}
void print(double number) {
std::cout << "Printing a double: " << number << std::endl;
}
void print(const std::string& text) {
std::cout << "Printing a string: " << text << std::endl;
}
int main() {
print(10);
print(3.12);
print("Hello, world!");
return 0;
}
In this example, we have multiple overloaded functions named print that take different parameter types. These functions are resolved at compile time based on the arguments passed to them.
In the main function, we call the print function with different argument types: an int, a double, and a const std::string&. The compiler determines the appropriate version of the print function to call based on the argument types provided.
This demonstrates compile-time polymorphism through function overloading. The compiler selects the correct version of the function based on the static types of the arguments at compile time. The function names and the argument types together determine which overloaded function is called.
Runtime Polymorphism
This type of polymorphism is achieved through virtual functions and function overriding. Late binding and dynamic polymorphism are other names for runtime polymorphism.
Virtual functions, allow the base class to define a method that can be overridden by derived classes. When a function is called on a pointer or reference to a base class object, the appropriate derived class implementation is invoked.
The function call is resolved at runtime. In contrast, with compile time polymorphism, the compiler determines which function call to bind to the object after deducing it at runtime.
class Shape {
public:
virtual void draw() const {
std::cout << "Drawing a shape" << std::endl;
}
};
class Circle : public Shape {
public:
void draw() const override {
std::cout << "Drawing a circle" << std::endl;
}
};
class Rectangle : public Shape {
public:
void draw() const override {
std::cout << "Drawing a rectangle" << std::endl;
}
};
int main() {
Shape* shapePtr;
Circle circle;
Rectangle rectangle;
shapePtr = &circle;
shapePtr->draw();
shapePtr = &rectangle;
shapePtr->draw();
return 0;
}
In this example, we have a base class Shape and two derived classes Circle and Rectangle. The Shape class has a virtual function draw(), which is overridden by the derived classes.
In the main function, we declare a pointer shapePtr of type Shape*. We then create objects of Circle and Rectangle.
We assign the address of the circle object to shapePtr and call the draw() function using the pointer. Since the draw() function is declared as virtual in the base class, the appropriate version of the function is called based on the actual object type (dynamic binding). In this case, it calls the draw() function of the Circle class.
Next, we assign the address of the rectangle object to shapePtr and again call the draw() function using the pointer. This time, the draw() function of the Rectangle class is invoked.
This demonstrates runtime polymorphism in C++. The draw() function is called based on the actual type of the object pointed to by the shapePtr pointer at runtime, allowing for dynamic dispatch and different behavior depending on the object type. This allows for code extensibility and flexibility, as new derived classes can be added without modifying the existing code that uses the base class interface.
Conclusion
Object-oriented design is a powerful approach for building complex software systems. By leveraging encapsulation, inheritance, polymorphism, abstraction, and composition, C++ programmers can create modular, reusable, and maintainable code that reflects the real-world objects they aim to represent.
Understanding and applying these principles can greatly enhance the quality and efficiency of software. C++ provides strong support for OOP concepts, making it an excellent language choice for implementing object-oriented designs. By combining these concepts with good design practices and design patterns, developers can create robust and scalable applications that are easier to understand, modify, and extend.
Contact us today to schedule a free consultation and learn more about improving the quality your software.
